{"id":13751,"date":"2026-08-12T08:48:28","date_gmt":"2026-08-12T07:48:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/identpro.de\/?page_id=13751"},"modified":"2026-08-12T09:24:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T08:24:15","slug":"sap-ewm-less-scanning","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/identpro.de\/en\/practical-questions\/sap-ewm-less-scanning\/","title":{"rendered":"sap-ewm-less-scanning"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n\n

Warehouse Execution System<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

\n\n

How can I operate SAP EWM\u00ae with less scanning effort?<\/h1>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n
<\/div>\n\n
\n\n

Why is manual scanning the biggest weak point in every SAP project?<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n
\n\n

Are there ways to operate SAP EWM\u00ae without manual scanning?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, but the answer depends on how deep the problem runs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyone who occasionally has scan errors has a training problem. Anyone who is permanently dealing with inventory discrepancies, incorrect bookings and search runs has a structural problem: SAP EWM\u00ae depends on manual scans and every scan is a potential source of error. This cannot be solved with stricter scanning requirements or more controls, but only by removing the scan from the process altogether.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\nTalk to our experts<\/a>\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

\n\n

What options are there for reducing the scanning effort in SAP EWM\u00ae?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/div><\/div>


Simplifying and consolidating scanning requirements<\/strong><\/strong><\/h3><\/div>
<\/div>

The simplest organisational intervention: consolidate booking steps, reduce scan points, simplify processes. Cost: low. Impact: limited. SAP EWM\u00ae operates at handling unit level and requires granular bookings. Anyone who skips steps loses transparency. The underlying problem remains: every remaining scan is still a source of error.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n

\n\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/div><\/div>


RFID as a scanning substitute<\/strong><\/strong><\/h3><\/div>
<\/div>

RFID tags on pallets and storage locations enable automatic bookings without an active scanning step. Less manual effort, fewer scan errors. But: RFID requires infrastructure investment, is susceptible to interference from metal and moisture, and does not work reliably in all warehouse environments. In outdoor warehouses, chemical storage or with unpackaged goods in particular, RFID quickly reaches its limits.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/div><\/div>


LiDAR-based real-time capture with WES<\/strong><\/strong><\/h3><\/div>
<\/div>

A Warehouse Execution System (WES) with LiDAR sensor technology captures all warehouse movements automatically without a forklift truck operator needing to scan a barcode or press a button. The system knows at all times, to the centimetre, where every pallet is located and which movement is currently taking place. This data flows automatically and bidirectionally back into SAP EWM\u00ae: no manual intermediate step, no transfer error, no time delay. No scan = no scan error.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

\n\n

What does manual scanning in SAP EWM\u00ae actually cost?<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\n\n

In everyday operations, scanning effort feels like an unavoidable part of running a warehouse. In total, it is a significant cost factor, particularly in SAP EWM\u00ae environments that depend on granular bookings.<\/p>\n\n\n